The article critiques the Iglesia Ni Cristo’s position that biblical scripture cannot be fully understood without the guidance of a properly ordained messenger. It argues that this stance undermines the authority and sufficiency of the biblical messengers themselves, implying that figures like David or the apostles were inadequate in conveying God’s truth. By requiring additional interpretation from modern INC ministers, the essay asserts that the INC creates a cycle of dependence on human mediation, rather than trusting the clarity and self-sufficiency of scripture. It challenges the INC’s arguments about cultural differences, interaction, and presence, concluding that scripture is accessible and authoritative on its own, as exemplified by the Bereans in Acts 17:10-11.
The Iglesia Ni Cristo does not teach that all verses in the Bible cannot be understood without the need for a messenger. Many verses in the Bible are written in straightforward language and convey clear messages that can be easily understood by a wide audience. While some passages are clear, others can be difficult due to complex theological concepts, prophetic texts and their fulfillments, symbolic language, and apocalyptic messages. These teachings require the guidance of a messenger authorized by God.
Examples of verses that convey clear messages are the passages in Psalm 95. The article claims that Hebrews 3-4 explains Psalm 95, as if Psalm 95 needs interpretation, when in fact Hebrews 3-4 only references Psalm 95. When one verse references another, it acknowledges or alludes to the content or authority of that verse without necessarily explaining or interpreting it. When one verse explains another, it provides clarification, interpretation, or elaboration on the meaning of the other verse. This can include unpacking theological concepts, providing context, or drawing out implications. This is not the case with Hebrews 3-4.
True Iglesia Information 